ChironAI™ OM · why: defensibility

Write the report opposing counsel cannot take apart.

Substantial evidence is the standard. Chiron tests your opinion against it before anyone else does.

Book a demo

01

Defend This

Chiron plays opposing counsel against your adopted determinations, then prepares a response for you to decide on.

Defend This

Before opposing counsel reads your report, Chiron plays opposing counsel — then drafts the rebuttal.

  • A two-pass review of adopted causation, apportionment and impairment determinations: pass one hunts weaknesses as opposing counsel would; pass two prepares a response for the physician to decide on.
  • The result is saved as a defense packet, and submission is refused while any exposure is held for review.
  • Reviews an opposing QME or UR report for substantial-evidence gaps and prepares a working draft of a rebuttal letter, every quote grounded in the source, for the physician to edit and sign.

02

Every statement traced

Digest entries cite their source and are challenged by a second reader; consistency QA catches uncited statements.

§4062.3 record digest

An evaluator-scope chronology built only from admissible records — and a second reader that tries to refute every entry before you see it.

  • Builds the case chronology per scope: evaluator (admissible records only, Lab. Code §4062.3) or treating (full chart), each entry citing its source document.
  • A second pass tries to refute each entry against its cited source and marks it confirmed, unsupported or contradicted.
  • Where two sources disagree — treating versus prior QME on causation or work status — the conflict is surfaced neutrally, citing both.

QME report, panel to signature

From panel request to a signed §4628 report: Chiron organizes the records, prepares a working draft and checks the twelve required elements. You review the records, decide every conclusion, edit and sign.

  • The whole QME panel lifecycle — request, issuance, strike, selection, scheduling, replacement — runs as one tracked workflow.
  • Chiron prepares a working draft of any of the twelve §4628 report sections on demand, showing its reasoning as it works; the physician personally reviews the records, decides every conclusion, edits and signs.
  • Before finalising, a §4628 required-content checklist runs against the draft.
  • A whole-draft consistency scan flags body parts diagnosed but never examined, date conflicts and uncited statements.
  • The physician attests sole authorship and AI-assist disclosure and signs the §4628(j) declaration; nothing finalises without it.
  • Anyone holding a finalized QME report can check it against the stored record by its hash, without an account.

03

Your opinion, by design

The recorded opinion is only ever the physician’s own Adopt, Edit or Disagree decision — and only a physician can attest a report.

Chiron recommends. You adopt, edit or disagree.

For causation, apportionment, MMI and work restrictions, Chiron lays out the evidence and a suggested position with its reasoning — the conclusion is yours, and only your decision is recorded.

  • Chiron sets out a suggested causation, apportionment, MMI or work-restriction position with its evidence, verified by a separate pass; the physician decides the conclusion — adopt, edit or disagree.
  • A server-side guard, in two independent layers, lets the causation-opinion section draft only from the physician’s own decision or a finalized analysis — never from an unreviewed AI analysis.

Impairment and apportionment

AMA Guides 5th-edition ratings and multi-factor apportionment, drafted with their reasoning and checked for Almaraz/Guzman support.

  • Chiron proposes the AMA Guides 5th-edition chapter, table and category per body part from diagnoses and exam findings.
  • Checks whether a rating that departs from a strict Guides category carries the documented justification Almaraz/Guzman requires.
  • Analyses industrial and non-industrial causation-of-disability factors across sources and prepares a working draft of the apportionment narrative; the physician decides the conclusion.
Isometric illustration of an arch of varied blocks under a highlighted keystone, each block anchored into the base by a fine thread, flanked by heavy blocks on both sides

More reasons

Keep reading.

See it run on a real claim.

A live demo on a synthetic case — panel, records, report, billing. The AI reasons. The clinician decides.

Book a demo
Next stepOne conversation

See it run an encounter that looks like yours.

Tell us the workflow you want to see and who needs to be in the room. A member of our clinical and engineering team replies within two business days to arrange it — a real person, not a sequence.

Talk to our team →

What happens after you send it

  1. 01. The form reaches a monitored inbox. No auto-sequence.
  2. 02. We reply within two business days to book a time that suits you.
  3. 03. Forty-five minutes: your workflow, the reasoning trace, procurement questions.

Prefer to talk now? +1 (949) 200-8668, or email hello@mindhyve.ai.